Paragon Backup & Restore Free vs Macrium Reflect Free vs EASEUS Todo Backup vs DriveImage XML vs Acronis True Image Home: Which one should you use?

November 3, 2009 106 Email article | Print article

As mentioned in my recent article on Paragon Backup & Restore Free, I have written about many free image backup software – 10 to be exact. Out of all my articles, three were my top picks: Paragon Backup & Restore Free, Macrium Reflect Free, and EASEUS Todo Backup. I decided it is now time to do a clear and comprehensive comparison of all three to see which one is “best”. Although I am not a big fan of it, I decided to include DriveImage XML in this comparison also because many people have requested me to review it (even though I already did include it in my other article) and I am afraid they may stab me in my sleep if I don’t write about it now. Furthermore, even though Acronis True Image Home is a commercial image backup software while the other four are free image backup software, I have been asked to include Acronis in this comparison and considering how popular it is, I am more than obliged. However keep in mind because Acronis is a commercial program, it will have many goodies that free image backup software don’t have so it really wouldn’t be a fair fight in terms of features.

When comparing image backup software, the two things to compare are features and performance (user friendliness is also important, but most image backup software are point and click anyway). So lets get to it.

Features

Image_Backup_Program_Comparisons2

As you can see, for the most part the main features are present in all five software. Here are the feature differences I would like to highlight:

  • Interestingly enough, DriveImage XML is the only one that is able to create a backup image of a USB/flash drive. Even Acronis did not detect my USB/flash drive and give me the option to create an image backup of it (unless of course, I missed it but I highly doubt that).
  • Amongst the free image backup software, Paragon is the only one that can do differential backups; all others can only do full backups.
  • Amongst the free image backup software, Paragon is the only one that can create a bootable USB/flash drive.
  • EASEUS Todo Backup is the only one that is free for everyone – commercial and non-commercial use.
  • DriveImage XML is the only one with a portable version (as far as I know).
  • DriveImage XML is a less than 2 MB download while the other software are much, much larger.

Performance

All image backup software were tested under the similar conditions on the same computer: a laptop running Windows 7 Professional 32-bit with 3GB of RAM, a Radeon HD 2600 512MB graphics card, and an Intel T8300 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo processor.

Each image backup software was made to do a full image backup of a 10.4 GB (4.77 GB filled) partition. Each program was set to the highest compression setting available for the program. This is how they all performed:

Image_Backup_Program_Comparisons4

Not surprisingly, Acronis has the best figures in speed and compression. However it is worth noting Acronis is also the more heavy on computer resources. Both EASEUS And DriveImage performed well in terms of compression but both are really slow. Macrium was the least resource intensive, and yet it was the second fastest; however compression can be improved for Macrium seeing as it is beat out by EASEUS, DriveImage, and Acronis in that category.

One weird thing worth mentioning is after I ran EASEUS the first time, from which I got the above results, I went back to test EASEUS again to make sure my results were accurate and consistent. However EASEUS kept locking up my computer about 15 seconds into the image backup and I would have to hard reset. This happened three times. Not sure what is up.

Conclusion

Personally speaking, if I had the money to purchase Acronis True Image, I would because the two things I like most for image backup software are speed and compression. However, for those that don’t want to purchase Acronis don’t fret; as you can see by my results posted about, Paragon Backup & Recovery Free, Macrium Reflect Free, EASEUS Todo Backup, and DriveImage XML are all great, and well performing, free image backup software. It is hard to go wrong with either of them (except maybe EASEUS Todo Backup; users may want to wait until the developer updates it a little bit more and fixes the bugs). Which one you will use depends on your needs. If you want a free  image backup software that is small in size and has the best compression, go with DriveImage XML (however before you go with DriveImage XML, be sure to Google and learn how to create the bootable CD/DVD – see the How-To-Geek forum link which is the fourth one down – because creating a bootable disk is quite difficult with DriveImage XML). If you want a fast and light on computer resources software, go with Macrium Reflect Free. If you are on a netbook and don’t have a CD/DVD drive, grab Paragon Backup & Recovery Free so you can make use of the bootable USB/flash drive. Personally, my favorite is still Macrium Reflect Free because it is fast but still light on computer resources.

Whichever one you decide to go with, you can grab them from the following links:

Paragon Backup & Restore Free

Version reviewed: v10 Build 8927 (30.09.09 ) Free Edition

Supported OS: Windows 2000, XP, Vista, Win7

License limitation: Non-commercial use only

dotTech full review on Paragon Backup & Restore Free

Paragon Backup & Restore Free Edition homepage

[Direct download - 32-bit version]

[Direct download - 64-bit version]

Macrium Reflect Free

Version reviewed: v4.2 build 2082

Supported OS: Windows XP, Vista, Windows 7

License limitation: For personal use

dotTech article on Macrium Reflect Free

Macrium Reflect Free homepage

[Download link]

EASEUS Todo Backup

Version reviewed: v1.0

Supported OS: Windows 2000/2003/XP/Vista/2008

License limitation: No limitation – free for everyone

dotTech article on EASEUS Todo Backup

EASEUS Todo Backup homepage

[Direct download]

DriveImage XML

Version reviewed: v2.12

Supported OS: Windows XP, 2003, Vista, or Windows 7

License limitation: For private use

DriveImage XML homepage

[Direct download]

[Portable version download]

Acronis True Image Home

Version reviewed: 2010 build 5,055

Supported OS: Windows XP, Vista, Win7

Price: $49.99

Acronis True Image Home homepage

[Direct buy link]

106 Comments »

  1. Larry Brown July 31, 2012 at 10:16 AM (comment permalink) -

    EaseUS is “a little buggy” when it won’t run at all and locks up your computer? And “you’re not sure what’s up with that?” I’ll tell you exactly “what’s up with that:” EaseUS is crap. I can’t see a program not running at all and locking up your computer repeatedly and you decide “it’s a little buggy.” That compromises your integrity.

    “Backup” software should really be called “restore” software, because that’s really all that matters. You can “Backup” your system with every software on earth but if you can’t “restore” it when needed all you’ve done is worse than just waste your time. I notice that your handy review does not rate “restoring.” That makes your review totally useless.

    Acronis was formerly a good product, but as of v2012 it’s garbage. EaseUS “Todo Backup” also was formerly a good product, but it no longer works for me, the EaseUS people admit that it’s not good for restoring from images saved on DVDs, and I could not get it to recognized backups that were spanned across multiple DVDs and you aren’t going to get any OS partition backed up to a single DVD anymore. If EaseUS is related to Acronis, as someone above stated, that would explain it.

    Your review helps us decide which softwares “backup” well. We don’t need a review to tell us that. Every backup software in the world is pretty good a backing up. However, almost all fall short when it comes time to restore and that’s what really matters.

    The reviewer, as well as a few commenters above, are apparently in the habit of making backups without testing them and proving that they can be restore when needed. I’ve got news for you: 99+% chance that all of those untested backups are useless.

    101
  2. Vincent August 10, 2012 at 7:44 AM (comment permalink) -

    Jeeze… Now I Am More Confused Than Ever Before…. Here’s Why…
    I have used Macrium, and Paragon, and DriveImage…..
    All Legit, all FREE, made the backup cd/dvd/usb flash….
    And GUESS what?
    None and I do repeat NONE… can recover my drive?
    Just comes up with ERROR cannot REcover??????
    Can you do a new 2012 Review… Cause nothing works for me!
    Many Thanks
    Vincent

    102
  3. Merel August 13, 2012 at 7:52 AM (comment permalink) -

    @Vincent:

    That’s just guessing for some reason :
    Are you sure that for each separate test you have been using a ‘booting media’ which was made with the latest version of each software ? Maybe some older bootable CD’s are not ‘compatible’ any more with the latest backup software versions you are using at the moment ?

    (Somehow like Microsoft programs which sometimes cannot open “Microsoft-made” user’s data files anymore.)

    Your post makes me think that it is time to test the ability to ‘restore’ using the programs now installed: Acronis TIH (2 different versions) and Macrium Reflect (Free). The last one allows FULL backup ONLY.

    103
  4. John A. August 22, 2012 at 4:39 PM (comment permalink) -

    Larry Brown said “Acronis was formerly a good product, but as of v2012 it’s garbage”.

    What are your reasons for garbage? What version
    of Acronis is the Best?

    104
  5. Jerry February 25, 2013 at 8:54 AM (comment permalink) -

    if i create a usb bootable recovery on windows xp and i later buy a new computer with a later winodws OS, can I use the bootable USB on the new computer so I can revert back to my old OS and software?

    105
  6. Backup March 10, 2013 at 9:27 AM (comment permalink) -

    [@John A.]

    I also heard that the old versions of acronis, like true image 9.0 are more stable and reliable, but the thing is that you won’t be able to download the latest builds for these versions in case of hardware incompatibility or lack of drivers… as to the latest versions 2012 and 2013 they seem to add only synchronization feature and improve the overall software stability, here is comparison review of these two http://www.acroniscoupon.info/acronis-true-image-2013-vs-2012.html

    106

Leave A Response »