Secret FISC court judge says NSA repeatedly went too far

nsa judge story

Another judge is unhappy with the conduct of the National Security Agency (NSA). This time it is Judge John D. Bates of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) — the court that must give approval for surveillance tactics by NSA and co — and it’s because the NSA didn’t follow the proper guidelines that the court set out when it comes to collecting data on US citizen email traffic.

“[National Security Agency’s] record of compliance with these rules has been poor,” Judge Bates wrote in an opinion that was just recently released. This document, as well as 2000 others, have been declassified by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, or ODNI.

“Most notably, NSA generally disregarded the special rules for disseminating United States person information outside of NSA until it was ordered to report such disseminations and certify to the FISC that the required approval had been approved,” he also wrote. “The government has provided no meaningful explanation why these violations occurred, but it seems likely that widespread ignorance of the rules was a contributing factor.”

The documents in question were let go by the government because of a lawsuit brought to them by the Electronic Frontier Foundation and American Civil Liberties Union.

“Release of these documents reflects the Executive Branch’s continued commitment to making information about this intelligence collection program publicly available when appropriate and consistent with the national security of the United States,” James Clapper, who is in charge of the ODNI, said.

“Additionally, they demonstrate the extent to which the Intelligence Community kept both Congress and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court apprised of the status of the collection program under Section 215 [of the Patriot Act]. Some information has been redacted because these documents include discussion of matters that continue to be properly classified for national security reasons and the harm to national security would be great if disclosed.”

Despite being unhappy with the NSA’s request to expand their surveillance by up to 24 times, he still allowed them to so because they are part of the Executive Branch. The release of this document, though, signals a potential change of view in the FISC court and perhaps the court will actually be able to uphold some sort of justice, or at least try to, in the future.

[via Arstechnica, Judge Bates’ Opinion]

Share this post

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

4 comments

  1. Seamus McSeamus

    [@Darcy] In the USA these days, there is one set of laws for the peons and another for the government. The government, as has been proven repeatedly, does what it wants regardless of what the law says. And the people have been dumbed down to the point that they accept government as their masters.

  2. kevbo

    This bozo who has taken an oath to defend and uphold the Constitution stands by and allows this to happen for the last ten years, and then claims he doesn’t like the cookies when their hands are caught in the cookie jar, yet they call Snowden a traitor. Screw you Judge.

  3. Seamus McSeamus

    This is the equivalent of catching your 12 year old smoking a cigarette, saying “junior, I’m very disappointed in your behavior; this is not what I expect from you”, and then buying him a new pack of cigarettes.