Europeans can finally legally resell used software

The European Union Court of Justice has upheld the right of users to resell software irrespective of their license restrictions. The court made its decision in a ruling against Oracle’s argument that the court should allow it to make provisions in the End User License Agreement (EULA) to disallow the redistribution of software licenses.

The new ruling stated that even if the license agreement proposed that the user shouldn’t redistribute or resell the software or software license, the resale will be at the sole discretion of the user and cannot be opposed. In other words, it is now officially legal for Europeans to resell used software — something Americans already enjoy (for the most part).

The court also noted that the new user to whom the software license is sold can download the software online from the software vendor’s website, while the original owner would have to make the copy of the software on his system unusable.

The proprietary software vendors are obviously unhappy with the decision and wouldn’t just take it sitting down. We may very well see this issue arise again in courts, soon. One of the points that  software vendors make is that software is not actually ‘sold’ but ‘licensed’, which disables a user’s ability to resale it; but the argument was not satisfying enough for the court.

Though the court has given users the ability to resell software, many online stores such as Apple App Store and Google Play Store are yet to have a system in place to transfer or resell licenses. However that shouldn’t be too hard to setup, should it? In any case, as software users let’s hope that the European court decision encourages other countries to take a similar step forward.

[via Engadget]

Share this post

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

5 comments

  1. msn show

    The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.

  2. jayesstee

    Why do we accept this “license” rubbish?

    If you buy an auto, you don’t just get a license to use a metal+plastic copy of the manufacturers copy protected plans. And if you are stupid enough, you can disassemble the auto and reassemble in any format you like. The authorities may not let you use it on the highway, but that’s not a beef with the manufacturer or supplier.

    If you hand over hard earned, over taxed cash then the implied contract should give you the rights of ownership.

  3. Mike

    @Richard: It seems to me that a good argument can be made that the “restricted” software should be allowed to be resold, but only under the original restrictions–such as, if a student version, to another student-qualified individual. Of course, policing this could prove difficult (although, if a system to obtain the software again only from the original manufacturer were set up, a system could be do-able), and this could be seen as too cumbersome.

  4. Richard

    Does this mean that oem operating system, or limited (such as academic) versions of Microsoft Office can be sold on ebay and the like, even if the doing so is contrary to the eula?