<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prevention, detection, and cure: 12 programs that will provide the best all-around security for you and your computer &#8211; for free</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dottech.org/featured/3174/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dottech.org/featured/3174?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=top-6-programs-that-will-provide-the-best-security-for-you-and-your-computer-for-free</link>
	<description>Professional Technologians</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:14:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://dottech.org/featured/3174/comment-page-4#comment-42424</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 20:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dottech.org/?p=3174#comment-42424</guid>
		<description>Avira&#039;s nag screen on update can be suppressed (Search &#039;suppress avira advert&#039; quickly finds the way). Alternatively it&#039;s easy to write an AHK script, easier in that reinstalling Avira does not require the procedure to suppress the nag to be redone.

Online Armor: Like Ashraf, I have sometimes found Online Armor seemingly inexplicably in conflict  with other programs, and its multiple prompts during installation or uninstallation can be annoying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Avira&#8217;s nag screen on update can be suppressed (Search &#8216;suppress avira advert&#8217; quickly finds the way). Alternatively it&#8217;s easy to write an AHK script, easier in that reinstalling Avira does not require the procedure to suppress the nag to be redone.</p>
<p>Online Armor: Like Ashraf, I have sometimes found Online Armor seemingly inexplicably in conflict  with other programs, and its multiple prompts during installation or uninstallation can be annoying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://dottech.org/featured/3174/comment-page-4#comment-42327</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 06:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dottech.org/?p=3174#comment-42327</guid>
		<description>A lot of what is best for anti-malware is now built-in, except DEP is OptIn by default where it should be OptOut (this change should really be recommended in the article). The best practice is to download wisely. I&#039;ve stopped using real-time traditional antivirus. DEP, UAC, Windows Firewall, System Restore, Windows Update, and browser checking (like SmartScreen or Google Chrome&#039;s domain checking + sandboxing), constitute reasonable protection. Antimalware beyond that can either slow things down or make conflicts (with behavior blocking or false positives), but that&#039;s just my opinion. Malwarebytes is a nice on-demand check. I just don&#039;t think that 3rd-party security software add-ons are generally worth it with all the improvements in Windows 7, but that&#039;s me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of what is best for anti-malware is now built-in, except DEP is OptIn by default where it should be OptOut (this change should really be recommended in the article). The best practice is to download wisely. I&#8217;ve stopped using real-time traditional antivirus. DEP, UAC, Windows Firewall, System Restore, Windows Update, and browser checking (like SmartScreen or Google Chrome&#8217;s domain checking + sandboxing), constitute reasonable protection. Antimalware beyond that can either slow things down or make conflicts (with behavior blocking or false positives), but that&#8217;s just my opinion. Malwarebytes is a nice on-demand check. I just don&#8217;t think that 3rd-party security software add-ons are generally worth it with all the improvements in Windows 7, but that&#8217;s me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Precyyse52</title>
		<link>http://dottech.org/featured/3174/comment-page-4#comment-41699</link>
		<dc:creator>Precyyse52</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 01:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dottech.org/?p=3174#comment-41699</guid>
		<description>Ashraf,,,,  I met you today via someone posting your link on GOTD offering a software that you wrote an advice on  (Icare Data Recovery) in March.
I normally do not write any comments etc. however, I do read alot to feel the feedback of others and what technology has to offer etc..  I then checked out dotTech.org and must say that I am impressed and at the same time thankful for the few such as you.  I have now made dotTech.org my home page.
Your statement was so on the money &quot;beware of who you open your door to and let in&quot;  I have learned this the hard way !  I don&#039;t download from GOTD but I do check  out to see what software is out there,,,,,
Gratefully,
Elizabeth  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ashraf,,,,  I met you today via someone posting your link on GOTD offering a software that you wrote an advice on  (Icare Data Recovery) in March.<br />
I normally do not write any comments etc. however, I do read alot to feel the feedback of others and what technology has to offer etc..  I then checked out dotTech.org and must say that I am impressed and at the same time thankful for the few such as you.  I have now made dotTech.org my home page.<br />
Your statement was so on the money &#8220;beware of who you open your door to and let in&#8221;  I have learned this the hard way !  I don&#8217;t download from GOTD but I do check  out to see what software is out there,,,,,<br />
Gratefully,<br />
Elizabeth  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dbnnet</title>
		<link>http://dottech.org/featured/3174/comment-page-4#comment-41216</link>
		<dc:creator>dbnnet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 18:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dottech.org/?p=3174#comment-41216</guid>
		<description>Outpost free firewall will indeed no longer install on Windows 7 - Suggest you remove this product from any reccomended list as it will only cause confusion and disappointment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outpost free firewall will indeed no longer install on Windows 7 &#8211; Suggest you remove this product from any reccomended list as it will only cause confusion and disappointment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buyerbeware</title>
		<link>http://dottech.org/featured/3174/comment-page-4#comment-41129</link>
		<dc:creator>buyerbeware</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 16:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dottech.org/?p=3174#comment-41129</guid>
		<description>I tried to download Threatfire using the above link and found that the free version link seemed to be deactivated.  Any alternate link?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried to download Threatfire using the above link and found that the free version link seemed to be deactivated.  Any alternate link?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RonCam</title>
		<link>http://dottech.org/featured/3174/comment-page-4#comment-40975</link>
		<dc:creator>RonCam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 19:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dottech.org/?p=3174#comment-40975</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Ashraf wrote:&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
The one thing I like about GeSWall is that it does not slow down your browser if your run it &quot;isolated&quot; as opposed to minor lag if I run a browser &quot;sandboxed&quot; with Sandboxie.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Check your sandboxie.ini configuration settings.

I was having performance issues (some sites wouldn&#039;t scroll smoothly, and so forth) with &lt;em&gt;Lunascape&lt;/em&gt;, and then noticed I had only made exceptions for variables stored in its %AppData% folders.  When I added the subdirectories in the below the main &lt;em&gt;Lunascape &lt;/em&gt;program folder to &lt;em&gt;OpenFilePath&lt;/em&gt;, the problem went away.

When all is optimally configured, there should be no noticeable performance &#039;hit&#039;.  Was this a browser with built-in settings, or did you have to figure it out, by yourself, I wonder?

We miss you, on Giveaway of the Day!  Hope you are well.
 
&lt;em&gt;Vijay wrote:&lt;/em&gt;@Ashraf ...
&lt;blockquote&gt;CAN you suggest a security combination that is neither CPU nor memory intensive&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I would use this same utility as mentioned above, on older software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Ashraf wrote:</em></p>
<blockquote><p>
The one thing I like about GeSWall is that it does not slow down your browser if your run it &#8220;isolated&#8221; as opposed to minor lag if I run a browser &#8220;sandboxed&#8221; with Sandboxie.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Check your sandboxie.ini configuration settings.</p>
<p>I was having performance issues (some sites wouldn&#8217;t scroll smoothly, and so forth) with <em>Lunascape</em>, and then noticed I had only made exceptions for variables stored in its %AppData% folders.  When I added the subdirectories in the below the main <em>Lunascape </em>program folder to <em>OpenFilePath</em>, the problem went away.</p>
<p>When all is optimally configured, there should be no noticeable performance &#8216;hit&#8217;.  Was this a browser with built-in settings, or did you have to figure it out, by yourself, I wonder?</p>
<p>We miss you, on Giveaway of the Day!  Hope you are well.<br />
 <br />
<em>Vijay wrote:</em>@Ashraf &#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>CAN you suggest a security combination that is neither CPU nor memory intensive</p></blockquote>
<p>I would use this same utility as mentioned above, on older software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Azure Sky</title>
		<link>http://dottech.org/featured/3174/comment-page-4#comment-40190</link>
		<dc:creator>Azure Sky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 01:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dottech.org/?p=3174#comment-40190</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@&lt;a href=&quot;3174/comment-page-4#comment-40159&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;greg&lt;/a&gt;:and very little decent commercial quality software either.....&lt;/strong&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@<a href="3174/comment-page-4#comment-40159" rel="nofollow">greg</a>:and very little decent commercial quality software either&#8230;..</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://dottech.org/featured/3174/comment-page-4#comment-40178</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 18:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dottech.org/?p=3174#comment-40178</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;@&lt;a href=&quot;3174/comment-page-4#comment-39505&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;chinaguy&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/strong&gt; Same deal here. What&#039;s up with that?
 

-Ken</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@<a href="3174/comment-page-4#comment-39505" rel="nofollow">chinaguy</a>:</strong> Same deal here. What&#8217;s up with that?<br />
 </p>
<p>-Ken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greg</title>
		<link>http://dottech.org/featured/3174/comment-page-4#comment-40159</link>
		<dc:creator>greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 11:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dottech.org/?p=3174#comment-40159</guid>
		<description>Alternative  ..linux :) no virus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alternative  ..linux :) no virus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chinaguy</title>
		<link>http://dottech.org/featured/3174/comment-page-4#comment-39505</link>
		<dc:creator>chinaguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 07:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dottech.org/?p=3174#comment-39505</guid>
		<description>It seems like now the Outpost free firewall will not even install on Windows 7. When I tried it said that Windows 7 is not supported by the free version and the setup dialog box never even opens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like now the Outpost free firewall will not even install on Windows 7. When I tried it said that Windows 7 is not supported by the free version and the setup dialog box never even opens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vijay</title>
		<link>http://dottech.org/featured/3174/comment-page-4#comment-39427</link>
		<dc:creator>Vijay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 17:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dottech.org/?p=3174#comment-39427</guid>
		<description>@Ashraf This is a great article, BUT many of us do not have the latest and greatest hardware and this multi tiered approach will older systems to a halt.
CAN you suggest a security combination that is neither CPU nor memory intensive?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ashraf This is a great article, BUT many of us do not have the latest and greatest hardware and this multi tiered approach will older systems to a halt.<br />
CAN you suggest a security combination that is neither CPU nor memory intensive?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sriram</title>
		<link>http://dottech.org/featured/3174/comment-page-4#comment-38783</link>
		<dc:creator>Sriram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 15:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dottech.org/?p=3174#comment-38783</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Thanks for the wonderful article,Ashraf!!&lt;/strong&gt;
And doesnt  Avast! give many &lt;strong&gt;false &lt;/strong&gt;positives??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Thanks for the wonderful article,Ashraf!!</strong><br />
And doesnt  Avast! give many <strong>false </strong>positives??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gpc111</title>
		<link>http://dottech.org/featured/3174/comment-page-4#comment-37538</link>
		<dc:creator>gpc111</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 20:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dottech.org/?p=3174#comment-37538</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the great article. My Norton 360 subscription will expire in a few months. Since I live outside of the US, it&#039;s hard for me to renew it. I will replace it with some of the programs you listed. I have paid versions of Malwarebyte and Winpatrol. I guess I will need an antivirus and a firewall. There are a lot to choose from your list. Take care and thanks again for your efforts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the great article. My Norton 360 subscription will expire in a few months. Since I live outside of the US, it&#8217;s hard for me to renew it. I will replace it with some of the programs you listed. I have paid versions of Malwarebyte and Winpatrol. I guess I will need an antivirus and a firewall. There are a lot to choose from your list. Take care and thanks again for your efforts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashraf</title>
		<link>http://dottech.org/featured/3174/comment-page-4#comment-37219</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashraf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 04:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dottech.org/?p=3174#comment-37219</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;strong&gt;@&lt;a href=&quot;3174/comment-page-4#comment-37191&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Sputnik&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;/span&gt;Um... yeah I could see a viable case for that argument.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span><strong>@<a href="3174/comment-page-4#comment-37191" rel="nofollow">Sputnik</a>:</strong> </span>Um&#8230; yeah I could see a viable case for that argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.906 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-07-29 10:31:07 -->
