Topic RSS
"PCs are under constant attack from
viruses, spyware and identity theft. Every day you hear about a new
threat to your PC. They're coming faster than ever before, they're
getting harder to stop and traditional antivirus products are not able
to keep up."
"Will your antivirus software catch the latest
malware that just came out today? In most cases, no, because it simply
does not know how to detect it yet. But ThreatFire's ActiveDefense
technology does, and has proven to provide up to 243% more protection
when combined with traditional AntiVirus products. See the table below."
_______________
[http://www.threatfire.com]
*all the info from ^
ORLLY!? How about intense lag? This thing lagged up my laptop so much, after uninstallation, I still had to bring it to the technician to fix my f###ed up laptop! 
It may be different to others, but this is my experience with PC Tools. Besides… no virus can beat the crap out of me with Malwarebytes' and ESET NOD32 Sh#t Loaded Edition combined! 
~Joji~
Offline
OfflineI'm using ImmunetProtect now instead of Threatfire. It's good. Very low resource use. Worth checking out if you're looking for an alternative.
OfflinePCbasics said:
FWIW
First, of course, Threatfire isn't really an anti-virus and while YOU probably know that many might not and using it as a stand-alone av would not be a good idea.
Second, many (most) av solutions offer a behavior-blocker *like* threatfire so adding it would be unnecessary overkill. Moreover, using it with another hips/bb might start giving weird results. I *think* I observed that with Norton; suddenly started getting weird alerts about programs that I knew (believed, anyway) to be OK. I uninstalled TF and everything returned to normal. (Norton has its own bb).
Third, Threatfire is infamous for not playing well with other software and adding it *might* make you wish that you hadn't. Don't know if it has been fixed, but Avira (I think) *used* to have a big-time problem with TF.
Offline
Offlinephoenix_rising said:
I'm using ImmunetProtect now instead of Threatfire. It's good. Very low resource use. Worth checking out if you're looking for an alternative.
I have DL based on your recommendation.


One ?, is it real time?
Ebony
phoenix_rising said:
I'm using ImmunetProtect now instead of Threatfire. It's good. Very low resource use. Worth checking out if you're looking for an alternative.
from the response of this topic about this topic, i think i might use this instead!!??
OfflineIt's in Ashraf's 12 security programs
http://dottech.org/tipsntricks/3174
"Varying from the norm signature based protection, Threatfire uses a unique 'behavior based' detection system. This methodology not only helps prevent conflict and slowdowns if Threatfire is used with other security software like avast! or Avira, but it provides a whole new angle at detecting scumware on your PC. Threatfire is one of the only free anti-malware programs that provides full real time detection and protection. Other programs such as Ad-Aware AE and Spyware Doctor provide limited real time protection that are signature based, raising the chance of conflict between security programs. Threatfire has the ability to detect all kinds of scumware; however the real-time protection is only for malware while there is an on demand scanner for everything else."
Offline@ Ebony: Yep, it's real-time. And absolutely the bare minimum of resource use, which is a huge bonus. It has already immediately picked up a couple of things before my AV did. It provides a nice added layer of protection. I think you'll like it!
OfflinePhoenix_Rising (and anyone else that has an opinion): When I read about Immunet, it sounds like it connects to their servers/computers/system every time you go online. And then stays connected the whole time too.
Maybe I'm being paranoid, but I'm not sure I like that. Wouldn't that give them the opportunity to be scanning my computer for info I don't want them to get and to track my internet usage?
Or would MSE and Malwarebytes (I have the upgrade version so it does live scanning and blocking) keep that from happening?
I like the idea of what Immunet does basically, but am concerned about privacy. I'd really like to hear your thoughts.
Or, do you think I should just go have some coffee, a brownie, and a "chill-pill"…
Offline@ Wheezer: Hey there! Well, as far as I know, no one in this particular user community can just access my comp (at least, I don't think they can). Personally, I'm not worried. But I think the final call has to be yours – what you're comfortable with and what you're not. For more info on it, you can check out the write-up on Gizmo's site: http://www.techsupportalert.com/content/immunet-protect-cloud-based-anti-malware.htm
Most Users Ever Online: 253
Currently Online:
39 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
phoenix_rising: 899
karen: 878
Wheezer: 786
yourpalal: 647
PCbasics: 612
ebony: 548
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 9
Members: 7523
Moderators: 0
Admins: 3
Forum Stats:
Groups: 3
Forums: 17
Topics: 2192
Posts: 15804
Newest Members: Ubuntu60, Shyam, nitsujpox, cayci, friedris, follower1
Administrators: Ashraf (1741), Locutus (1886), amnesia (270)