<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>dotTech - Topic: Comment/forum spammers are getting more sophisticated...</title>
	<link>http://dottech.org/forums/gen-tech/commentforum-spammers-are-getting-more-sophisticated/</link>
	<description><![CDATA[Professional Technologians]]></description>
	<generator>Simple:Press Version 5.2.6</generator>
	<atom:link href="http://dottech.org/forums/gen-tech/commentforum-spammers-are-getting-more-sophisticated/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <item>
        	<title>Ashraf on Comment/forum spammers are getting more sophisticated...</title>
        	<link>http://dottech.org/forums/gen-tech/commentforum-spammers-are-getting-more-sophisticated/#p5499</link>
        	<category>Gen-Tech</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dottech.org/forums/gen-tech/commentforum-spammers-are-getting-more-sophisticated/#p5499</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Locutus said: </strong></p>
<blockquote><p>
Wait, wouldn't that not really do anything?  I mean, you have names-linking-to-websites turned off.</p>
</blockquote>
<hr />
 </p>
<p>That is exactly one of the reasons why I have it turned off - I can't sit here and ensure that every person that makes a comment is linking to a legit website.</p>
<p>However, to answer your question, yes it would do "something" if I approved the comment. You see the spam filters uses bayesian analysis. In other words, it "learns as it goes". Every spam comment that I mark as "not spam" is recorded as a false positive by the spam filter. So, the next time a comment - that may be spam - is made by the same person, that comment is more likely to be approved by the spam filter as opposed to if I didn't approve the first comment.</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 22:55:56 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Locutus on Comment/forum spammers are getting more sophisticated...</title>
        	<link>http://dottech.org/forums/gen-tech/commentforum-spammers-are-getting-more-sophisticated/#p5487</link>
        	<category>Gen-Tech</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dottech.org/forums/gen-tech/commentforum-spammers-are-getting-more-sophisticated/#p5487</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Wait, wouldn't that not really do anything?  I mean, you have names-linking-to-websites turned off.</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 18:17:14 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>karen on Comment/forum spammers are getting more sophisticated...</title>
        	<link>http://dottech.org/forums/gen-tech/commentforum-spammers-are-getting-more-sophisticated/#p5486</link>
        	<category>Gen-Tech</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dottech.org/forums/gen-tech/commentforum-spammers-are-getting-more-sophisticated/#p5486</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Glad you caught it.  Unfortunately, spam is effective way to often which is why they (the spammers) keep doing it.</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 17:54:18 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Ashraf on Comment/forum spammers are getting more sophisticated...</title>
        	<link>http://dottech.org/forums/gen-tech/commentforum-spammers-are-getting-more-sophisticated/#p5484</link>
        	<category>Gen-Tech</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dottech.org/forums/gen-tech/commentforum-spammers-are-getting-more-sophisticated/#p5484</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Okay so I have an anti-spam filter on the blog part of dotTech to protect dotTech from spammers. All comments – that are thought to be spam – are sent to the "spam" folder; I check the spam folder on a regular basis to make sure legit comments were not accidently marked as spam and to delete the spam comments. Lately I have noticed spammers are getting more sophisticated.</p>
<p>For example, I was *almost* tricked into allowing a spam comment. What the spammer did was copy a legit comment that was already posted:</p>
<p><img src="/wp-content/forum_uploads/ashraf/2010-04-18_171125.png" alt="" width="596" height="248" /></p>
<p> </p>
<p><img src="/wp-content/forum_uploads/ashraf/2010-04-18_171035.png" alt="" width="722" height="167" /></p>
<p>So when I was looking over the spam comments I thought to myself "wait a second, I swear I remember reading this comment before – why is it marked as spam?" I was just about to mark the spam comment as not spam and allow it to be posted when I realized that it was a spammer that was duplicating a real comment. Sheesh – tricky, tricky.</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 17:17:50 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
</channel>
</rss>