Topic RSS

OfflineSo I just noticed something while using LMGTFY (Let Me Google That For You). Every search query run through LMGTFY is redirected through VanillaResults.com, which then redirects to Google.com.
I did a bit of research on VanillaResults and it definetly is run by the same people that run LMGTFY (ping them – they both have the same IP). Other than that, I can't see to understand what it is, or why we are redirected through it instead of being sent directly to Google.
One thing I do know, however, is that VanillaResults.com makes use of Google' "Custom Engine", so every advertisement on Google.com clicked on earns the owners of VanillaResults/LMGTFY some revenue (similar to how dotTech's search – see search box at the top – is). So that could be why VanillaResults.com is being used; however why couldn't the developer just do the samething with LMGTFY without using VanillaResults.com as an intermediary?
Call me a conspiracy theorist, but something seems suspicious here.
Offline
Offline
Offline
Offline
OfflineLol….suspicious….I think it somewhat falls under false pretenses and bad behaviour.
At least in the way of them making more money in this way. If they own both companies and then redirect to themselves through users search inputs…..seems to me that's no different.
It sounds like they're getting double the amount per search (maybe more) if they own both and are one in the same. That's just my opinion though.
On the opposite side….they may very well have a legitimate excuse or reason for redirecting to another one of their sites that they own….maybe….
*tries to think of an adequate excuse or reason for them…."hmm…."*
Nope I can't think of a valid reason or excuse off hand.
Sounds to me that they've just found a way to double what revenue they get that most users wouldn't see or realize.
OfflineThat's a good possibility, though I would think it would be more efficient to fix the errors on the original than make a whole new site to do the same thing. Again that's just my opinion.
I'm not all that knowledgable on click tracking. However……Seems that having two (or more) sites tracking in that way or for that reason would also cause a great deal of inaccuracies and be unreliable information.
Orchid said:
That's a good possibility, though I would think it would be more efficient to fix the errors on the original than make a whole new site to do the same thing. Again that's just my opinion.
I'm not all that knowledgable on click tracking. However……Seems that having two (or more) sites tracking in that way or for that reason would also cause a great deal of inaccuracies and be unreliable information.
So what? They don't take our money.
j/k, i care but I can't do anything 
Offlineknow, however, is that VanillaResults.com makes use of Google' "Custom Engine", so every advertisement on Google.com clicked on earns the owners of VanillaResults/LMGTFY some revenue (similar to how dotTech's search – see search box at the top – is).
Does that mean if we were comitted to helping you, we could sit there for an hour googling stuff through that box, to make you money?
OfflineInstead of doing fancy stuff like pinging, why didn't you just visit the site? :)
It's all explained there… if it wasn't back in March, accept my apologies. Maybe some conspirator added the explanation on the site.
Hi,
I checked the code of "let me google that for you". In javascript file "bundle.js" VanillaResults.com. On this page search engine code is present. Overall it is not harm ful. It is the way to increatse the traffic of VanillaResults.com. It is just showing the results (of google) via this site.
Any way thanks for providing a clean script of VanillaResults.co.
Thanks,

Most Users Ever Online: 253
Currently Online:
27 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
phoenix_rising: 899
karen: 878
Wheezer: 786
yourpalal: 647
PCbasics: 612
ebony: 548
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 9
Members: 7523
Moderators: 0
Admins: 3
Forum Stats:
Groups: 3
Forums: 17
Topics: 2192
Posts: 15804
Newest Members: will56678, xmlld, vishnu, haseen, CuttntThroats4Life, manikanta
Administrators: Ashraf (1741), Locutus (1886), amnesia (270)