Winamp vs Mediamonkey | Gen-Tech | Forums

I read many reviews, tried 3 apps & settled down on just 1 app – Media Monkey Standard – not the paid version. I've not deleted the other 2apps – JRiver Media Jukebox & RealPlayer.

I have VLC & KMPlayer. Both are class acts, the latter is classier. However as Pwnana rightly pointed out VLC is a different genre of app in terms of need & usage. Therefore let's keep both VLC & KMPlayer out of this post.

Learnings:-

1) First one has to decide whether one is looking for "good library mgt" or mainly a "good player"

2) After that one has to choose the best app within that genre.

3) A good library organizer at least has to be an acceptably good (or better than just being acceptable) at playing. It invariably is. One has to be practical about this aspect. The human ear can make out frequencies & sound quality only within a certain biological bandwidth. A machine can do so across a larger bandwidth. If you are looking at home use go by "biology"; if you are doing it for a commercial purpose go by the "machine". A tea taster or wine taster has a more sensitive tongue whereas others don't! But then a tea taster is doing a job the others are only drinking tea.

4) Since I was "only" using Winamp to play I searched for a "good library mgt app" rather than a "good player"

5) Although this primary objective is well defined you'd notice that there is a lot of intersection between primary benefits & secondary benefits  e.g. is it also a good ripper, a good burner, does it associate with more types of audio files etc etc. This particular aspect of the subject is either very putting off, very pedantic or just so detailed that either it just tires you or makes you drop off to sleep or just go for a walk!

6) After reading the reviews in cnet I shortlisted only 2 librarians based upon varius parameters & user ratings – MediaMonkey & JRiver Media Jukebox

7) I found MediaMonkey's excellent reputation fully justified & its features awesome. That's why it is my only aka main librarian now

8) Why?

• Even e.g. if 1000 songs (BTW it can handle 50,000 & still run fast) are thoroughly disorganized this bloke can organize it – both along some default parameters & also along customized parameters you'd like to define. You can do it even in just 5 minutes. OKAY OKAY GO EASY ON THAT 5 MINUTE BECAUSE SOME OF US ARE MORE DISORGANIZED AND/OR SOME OF US HAVE MORE SONGS. THEREFORE IMHO YMMV.
• You do not have to suffer through each song 1 by 1 all the way up to 1000. e.g. let us say you have 213 Hindi film songs, 337 Mexican Cha Cha Cha, 457 Jamaican Reggae & 678 German Ballads. YOU NEED NOT HAVE TO SUFFER AWAY SONG BY SONG. Some parameters would be common e.g. the language of the song, whether it is a ballad, trip hop, trance, synthpop or cha cha cha for instance. There would also be uncommon parameters – is it fast/slow, instrumental/vocal etc etc etc
• MM is smart.You can do your classification fully or partially; song by song or all in one shot. It has a property dialog box for an I'd-like-to-enter-the properties-seperately-one-by-one-for-each-song-basis.
• MM also has a Property Stamp where you can say – "Man I find this one by one very dreary & besides I am short on time". In which case just select a bunch of songs & use the Stamp 
• Obviously you can use the stamp AND ALSO the one-by-one approach. Pre plan & only after that get on to the "doing" bit
• MM allows this "1 by 1" , "stamp" or both for:-

1. Property definition
2. Editing property defined which you have defined earlier but which you feel needs correction
3. Formatting so that either you are "All Caps", "Proper Case", "Sentence Case", "All Small" etc
4. Several other things too including but not restricted to blank fields e.g. you do not as yet know the year of the song or the name of the album

• MM also allows you to store lyrics

• MM has a huge set of file associations. ONE PRACTICE I FOLLOW – SINCE I USE IT AS MY ONLY LIBRARY/MAIN LIBRARY I'VE CREATED MOST FILE ASSOCIATIONS WITH MM. I HAVE ASSOCIATED MY SECONDARY LIBRARIANS WITH FEWER FILE TYPES.  CERTAIN FILE ASSOCIATIONS I've CHOSEN NO APPS TO ASSOCIATE WITH
  
• MM does not handle .ra, .rm or .midi files. That is RealPlayer's forte. Therefore per force I also have RealPlayer. That said since I dislike floating in a sea of apps I've chosen to make RealPlayer as much a librarian as it is a good player (RealPlayer that is)
• Since my primary objective was to get a "good music librarian" rather than a "good player" everything else – ripping, burning, compiling, file format conversion et al were secondary concerns for me. I've satisfied those needs by apps where Ashraf says "ACCEPTED"

This post is getting long. There are some other learnings. I'll post it in the next post. Bye for now.

Ramesh

Thanks Jumbi

MM also has scripts. There are 2 types of scripts – "built in already" & "those you can plug in". The built in scripts are baked into the apps gui. Use them boldly bcos they are great.

The second category was lousy & so the script or rather its functionality broke down. Their names were – "EvilLyrics" & "MiniLyrics" These 2 blokes are apps aka plugin functionalities which let the lyrics of the song scroll down in front of your eyes on the screen when you listen to the song. Obviously hearing a song & simultaneously being able to read its lyrics is great.

Just one important learning – this genre of app / consumer benefit is far from being perfected. I am not going into the reasons. This genre of apps has not perfected its coding & scripting yet. So stay away from it because it can even freeze MM or make you worry if one of MM's dlls etc got shattered. I may be wrong because my facts are 2 months old. So do not go blindly by what I say. Update me so I can alter my thinking on this please.

One last learning follows in the immediate next post

Ramesh

One nice postscript to this thread. 

Duplicate Music Files Finder 1.6 does just what its name suggests. This is a peach of an app written by a coding aficionado who sadly is starved for donations.

Incidental learnings & why this app is a must have apart from MM, Magix Music Finder, MP3 Organizer Pro.

There are several different ways in which duplicate files can be found – therefore different types of algorithms exist. Duplicate files gooble up disk space faster than you & I realize. This is really worth it

Ramesh