Topic RSS

OfflineI am not cerain what you mean.
Do you mean an advertisement that was published prior to 1992? It would be 18 this year (if my math is correct).
Probably you mean a "naughty" ad (so indefinable! Does the glimpse of a tittie offend, or is it 'country matters', as Hamlet put it?)
No matter.
I'm offended by your request.
Though the Intranet may have been inclined to censorship, the Internet and the WorldWideWeb were, from the beginning, dedicated to the principle of _laissez-faire_, "let them do".
The XIth Commandment ought to be "Thou shalt not stop thy sibling's mouth."
We have been seeing recently a quarrel over net freedom, between google and China. It is about politics, not sex: but it is the same worm, the Worm of SelfRighteousness, that is gnawing-away at Freedom.
So I will not ease the Worm's chewing by telling you whether or not I have seen a naughty ad on dotTechhnologicians.
And I say so though I'm probably your oldest fan (born 1937), and I recently tossed a couple of sawbucks into your begging bowl, and told you lately that I love you.
xØx
jd
Offline
Offline@jivadas
What kind of answer to a polite request is that? If you enjoy the blog you should be happy to help make it better, not tear down the host for making a simple and reasonable request.
@Ashraf
I haven't noticed any "18+" adds as you put it, but I'll let you know if I do.
Is this counted as an adult advert? 

The link is: hxxp://www.hongkongcupid.com/ but this ad (I've seen it before) has a lot of variations for different countries. In the US you would probably never see this link. There is a list of sites that are related at the bottom of the link above, so you could block them all.
Offline
OfflineIf there are any Admins around, try this link currently at the bottom of the page (as at 9.02 AM Los Angeles Time).
Very strange! 
Those who will not reason are bigots, those who cannot, are fools, and those who dare not are slaves.
OfflineIf there are any Admins around, have a look at comment #59 at this thread:
Not nice! 
Those who will not reason are bigots, those who cannot, are fools, and those who dare not are slaves.
Dear Boss
I am about to ask a question why to repeat old posts without your observation, in between this topic emerged.
AS jayesstee reffered the link is in such a language we will never expect in dot .tech.
just have a look your self. And decide what is the use of digging into old news without observation.
rachana
Offline
Those who will not reason are bigots, those who cannot, are fools, and those who dare not are slaves.
Most Users Ever Online: 253
Currently Online:
28 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
phoenix_rising: 899
karen: 878
Wheezer: 786
yourpalal: 647
PCbasics: 612
ebony: 548
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 9
Members: 7523
Moderators: 0
Admins: 3
Forum Stats:
Groups: 3
Forums: 17
Topics: 2192
Posts: 15804
Newest Members: lucasjacbo, lindab137, rodnovaes, painchar, Joshc272, ahmed atia
Administrators: Ashraf (1741), Locutus (1886), amnesia (270)