<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>dotTech - Topic: Quick-Jump Buttons (QJB's)</title>
	<link>http://dottech.org/forums/improve-dottech/quick-jump-buttons-qjbs/</link>
	<description><![CDATA[Professional Technologians]]></description>
	<generator>Simple:Press Version 5.2.6</generator>
	<atom:link href="http://dottech.org/forums/improve-dottech/quick-jump-buttons-qjbs/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <item>
        	<title>AlanR on Quick-Jump Buttons (QJB's)</title>
        	<link>http://dottech.org/forums/improve-dottech/quick-jump-buttons-qjbs/page-2/#p9388</link>
        	<category>Improve dotTech</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dottech.org/forums/improve-dottech/quick-jump-buttons-qjbs/page-2/#p9388</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>@ YourPalAl : What is the real difference between Watch Topic &#38; Subscribe??</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px">Ask Mr. Boss, or other knowledgeable Admin. <img src="/wp-content/forum-smileys/sf-laugh.gif" alt="Laugh" /></p>
<p>….&#38;<br />
 ….Who's Foose??</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px">Ya <em><strong>NEVER</strong></em> watched "Overhaulin". ? (It's actually a programme about cars being "enhanced" both in performance and visually - which is where I drew an attempted humorous analogy.) Sorry to those global dotTechies that are not aware nor interested, or unable to see this TV show - it may not appeal to everyone. <img src="/wp-content/forum-smileys/sf-embarassed.gif" alt="Embarassed" /></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px">Mr. Foose is the lead designer and owner of company (in USA) concerned.</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 22:19:06 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>yourpalal on Quick-Jump Buttons (QJB's)</title>
        	<link>http://dottech.org/forums/improve-dottech/quick-jump-buttons-qjbs/#p9323</link>
        	<category>Improve dotTech</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dottech.org/forums/improve-dottech/quick-jump-buttons-qjbs/#p9323</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>AlanR said: </strong></p>
<blockquote><p>
@ <strong>yourpalal :  </strong>I feel and share your pain but am not going to get into a long discussion on the mentioned problems in this post.</p>
<p>Suffice it to say, I have alluded to the problems in another thread (see, can't remember which one now <img src="/wp-content/forum-smileys/sf-embarassed.gif" alt="Embarassed" />) and complained about the status therein. Namely, the search engine is in desperate need of a thorough overhaul. (Can Foose help?)</p>
<p>As for now, I try to keep track using the Watch Topic &#38; Subscribe to Topic link buttons provided for each thread topic. See lower left at end of the posts.</p>
<p>Let me know if that helps. <img src="/wp-content/forum-smileys/sf-cool.gif" alt="Cool" /></p>
<p> </p>
</blockquote>
<hr />
 </p>
<p>Hey AlanR:<img src="/wp-content/forum-smileys/sf-smile.gif" alt="Smile" /></p>
<p>Thanks for the reply &#38; info &#38;.... it helps to know other DTs who really care about our site feel the same. ..</p>
<p>.."can't remember which one now"....ya, that's what happens to me<img src="/wp-content/forum-smileys/sf-embarassed.gif" alt="Embarassed" />---again, if I didn't care about learning &#38; helping others, it wouldn't matter.</p>
<p>Also, I <em>do</em> use the Watch Topic &#38; Subscribe, but again, if the <span style="text-decoration: underline">amount of new topics</span> is overwhelming, it still makes it hard to track!<img src="/wp-content/forum-smileys/sf-frown.gif" alt="Frown" /></p>
<p>BTW: What is the real difference between Watch Topic &#38; Subscribe??....&#38; ....Who's Foose??<img src="/wp-content/forum-smileys/sf-wink.gif" alt="Wink" /></p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 18:38:37 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>AlanR on Quick-Jump Buttons (QJB's)</title>
        	<link>http://dottech.org/forums/improve-dottech/quick-jump-buttons-qjbs/#p9305</link>
        	<category>Improve dotTech</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dottech.org/forums/improve-dottech/quick-jump-buttons-qjbs/#p9305</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>@ <strong>yourpalal :  </strong>I feel and share your pain but am not going to get into a long discussion on the mentioned problems in this post.</p>
<p>Suffice it to say, I have alluded to the problems in another thread (see, can't remember which one now <img src="/wp-content/forum-smileys/sf-embarassed.gif" alt="Embarassed" />) and complained about the status therein. Namely, the search engine is in desperate need of a thorough overhaul. (Can Foose help?)</p>
<p>As for now, I try to keep track using the Watch Topic &#38; Subscribe to Topic link buttons provided for each thread topic. See lower left at end of the posts.</p>
<p>Let me know if that helps. <img src="/wp-content/forum-smileys/sf-cool.gif" alt="Cool" /></p>
<p> </p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 09:16:57 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>yourpalal on Quick-Jump Buttons (QJB's)</title>
        	<link>http://dottech.org/forums/improve-dottech/quick-jump-buttons-qjbs/#p9182</link>
        	<category>Improve dotTech</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dottech.org/forums/improve-dottech/quick-jump-buttons-qjbs/#p9182</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>AlanR said: ...</strong>Yes, you are correct - ALL associated discussion related should be consolidated into THIS Forum. <img src="/wp-content/forum-smileys/sf-yell.gif" alt="Yell" /></p>
<blockquote><p>
Read my initial post and you will see every aspect (and beyond) has already been mentioned in some way.</p>
<p>I thereby invoke the privilege of first rights and call upon the moderators to do their needfull stuff and move everything in connection to this thread.</p>
<p>Humbly yours... <img src="/wp-content/forum-smileys/sf-smile.gif" alt="Smile" /></p>
</blockquote>
<hr />
 </p>
<p>Hey AlanR:</p>
<p>I thereby invoke the...........5th amendment........no wait, that's another subject.....something to do with a chap who runs <img src="/wp-content/forum-smileys/sf-yell.gif" alt="Yell" /><strong>BP</strong><img src="/wp-content/forum-smileys/sf-yell.gif" alt="Yell" /><img src="/wp-content/forum-smileys/sf-yell.gif" alt="Yell" />!!!!!!!!<img src="/wp-content/forum-smileys/sf-yell.gif" alt="Yell" /><img src="/wp-content/forum-smileys/sf-yell.gif" alt="Yell" /></p>
<p>But really......IMHO part of the problem is that in the past 2 weeks or so.........there have been like<span style="text-decoration: underline"> 50 new topics</span>........most are by only a few people..........so many that when you go to look for something to respond to a few days later......it's <span style="text-decoration: underline"><em>buried </em></span>&#38;<span style="text-decoration: underline"> takes time</span> to find each old thread you were interested in......so many of these supposed NEW topics have already been covered.....</p>
<p>Seems that maybe we should have a limit of 2-4 new topics a day per person except, of course, <strong>Mr. Boss</strong> &#38; the <span style="text-decoration: underline">Admins</span>...</p>
<p>.....or like a<strong><span style="text-decoration: underline"> new topic quarantine</span></strong>.....of all<span style="text-decoration: underline"> new topics</span>, for the rest of us.......for say a few days to a week.................&#38; then the mods can <span style="text-decoration: underline">move it &#38; incorporate it</span> into old threads.......</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 23:55:46 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>AlanR on Quick-Jump Buttons (QJB's)</title>
        	<link>http://dottech.org/forums/improve-dottech/quick-jump-buttons-qjbs/#p9175</link>
        	<category>Improve dotTech</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dottech.org/forums/improve-dottech/quick-jump-buttons-qjbs/#p9175</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Gioneo said: </strong></p>
<blockquote><p>
As far as a button going down, maybe we could just do with the Page Dn or End keys... </p>
</blockquote>
<hr />
 </p>
<p>pg dn only jumps one page at a time, a DN-QJB would get the the end in one fast scroll - which is what I originally asked for (amonst others).<br />
The "end" key does very much the same I suppose but doesn't look as cool; besides, if there is a common on-screen button collection, the process becomes more intuitive IMHO.</p>
<p>Either way, whichever suits you best....<img src="/wp-content/forum-smileys/sf-smile.gif" alt="Smile" /></p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 23:32:56 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>AlanR on Quick-Jump Buttons (QJB's)</title>
        	<link>http://dottech.org/forums/improve-dottech/quick-jump-buttons-qjbs/#p9173</link>
        	<category>Improve dotTech</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dottech.org/forums/improve-dottech/quick-jump-buttons-qjbs/#p9173</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ashraf said: </strong></p>
<blockquote><p>
@AlanR: I added a button to go up, will look into for a button to go down.</p>
</blockquote>
<hr />
 </p>
<p>GREAT - noticed it (and some other suble mods you seem to have made) straight away but did not have time to remark immediately due to work assignment. You have been busy.! <img src="/wp-content/forum-smileys/sf-smile.gif" alt="Smile" /></p>
<p>Suggest the UP button is timmed by the inverse square law and the new DOWN button then added. This would thus only occupy same height as now but half the width, thereby reducing overlapping any underlying boxes.</p>
<p>Keep up the good work - and HOLIDAY. <img src="/wp-content/forum-smileys/sf-cool.gif" alt="Cool" /></p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 23:22:32 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>AlanR on Quick-Jump Buttons (QJB's)</title>
        	<link>http://dottech.org/forums/improve-dottech/quick-jump-buttons-qjbs/#p9172</link>
        	<category>Improve dotTech</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dottech.org/forums/improve-dottech/quick-jump-buttons-qjbs/#p9172</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>yourpalal said: </strong></p>
<blockquote><p>
This topic is being covered here:</p>
<p> </p>
<p><a href="/forums/talk-it-up/that-new-scroll-to-top-button-fan-club" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://dottech.org/forums/talk" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://dottech.org/forums/talk</a>.....n-fan-club</p>
<p> </p>
<p>so IMHO, one of them should be moved to consolidate topics</p>
</blockquote>
<hr />
 </p>
<p>Yes, you are correct - ALL associated discussion related should be consolidated into THIS Forum. <img src="/wp-content/forum-smileys/sf-yell.gif" alt="Yell" /></p>
<p>Read my initial post and you will see every aspect (and beyond) has already been mentioned in some way.</p>
<p>I thereby invoke the privilege of first rights and call upon the moderators to do their needfull stuff and move everything in connection to this thread.</p>
<p>Humbly yours... <img src="/wp-content/forum-smileys/sf-smile.gif" alt="Smile" /></p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 23:13:39 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Locutus on Quick-Jump Buttons (QJB's)</title>
        	<link>http://dottech.org/forums/improve-dottech/quick-jump-buttons-qjbs/#p8923</link>
        	<category>Improve dotTech</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dottech.org/forums/improve-dottech/quick-jump-buttons-qjbs/#p8923</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ashraf said: </strong></p>
<blockquote><p>
Working on it; I called in an expert for this one <img src="/wp-content/forum-smileys/sf-laugh.gif" alt="Laugh" />.</p>
</blockquote>
<hr />
 </p>
<p>Is it called Google? (﻿http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/dynamic-to-top/)</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 20:46:46 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>yourpalal on Quick-Jump Buttons (QJB's)</title>
        	<link>http://dottech.org/forums/improve-dottech/quick-jump-buttons-qjbs/#p8918</link>
        	<category>Improve dotTech</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dottech.org/forums/improve-dottech/quick-jump-buttons-qjbs/#p8918</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>This topic is being covered here:</p>
<p> </p>
<p><a href="http://dottech.org/forums/talk-it-up/that-new-scroll-to-top-button-fan-club" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://dottech.org/forums/talk-it-up/that-new-scroll-to-top-button-fan-club</a></p>
<p> </p>
<p>so IMHO, one of them should be moved to consolidate topics</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 20:32:58 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Ashraf on Quick-Jump Buttons (QJB's)</title>
        	<link>http://dottech.org/forums/improve-dottech/quick-jump-buttons-qjbs/#p8916</link>
        	<category>Improve dotTech</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dottech.org/forums/improve-dottech/quick-jump-buttons-qjbs/#p8916</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Working on it; I called in an expert for this one <img src="/wp-content/forum-smileys/sf-laugh.gif" alt="Laugh" />.</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 20:12:16 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>yourpalal on Quick-Jump Buttons (QJB's)</title>
        	<link>http://dottech.org/forums/improve-dottech/quick-jump-buttons-qjbs/#p8915</link>
        	<category>Improve dotTech</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dottech.org/forums/improve-dottech/quick-jump-buttons-qjbs/#p8915</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Well.............I see it goes straight to the top........but..........</p>
<p>.......what about one to go back to the bottom, too?????!!!!!!!!!!?????!!<img src="/wp-content/forum-smileys/sf-wink.gif" alt="Wink" /></p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 19:53:39 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Ashraf on Quick-Jump Buttons (QJB's)</title>
        	<link>http://dottech.org/forums/improve-dottech/quick-jump-buttons-qjbs/#p8912</link>
        	<category>Improve dotTech</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dottech.org/forums/improve-dottech/quick-jump-buttons-qjbs/#p8912</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>@Gioneo: Good point... haha.</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 19:48:50 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Gioneo on Quick-Jump Buttons (QJB's)</title>
        	<link>http://dottech.org/forums/improve-dottech/quick-jump-buttons-qjbs/#p8897</link>
        	<category>Improve dotTech</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dottech.org/forums/improve-dottech/quick-jump-buttons-qjbs/#p8897</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ashraf said: </strong></p>
<blockquote><p>
OMG this new QJB button is so cool. I just can't stop using it, hahahaha.</p>
<p>@Gioneo: Hmmm… that is an interesting proposal but I am wondering if a website can remap keys. Karen, where are youuuu.</p>
</blockquote>
<hr />
 </p>
<p>Purpose wise, it works already.</p>
<p>But I can only speak for myself ( I use my keyboard ALOT).</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 19:15:10 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Ashraf on Quick-Jump Buttons (QJB's)</title>
        	<link>http://dottech.org/forums/improve-dottech/quick-jump-buttons-qjbs/#p8893</link>
        	<category>Improve dotTech</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dottech.org/forums/improve-dottech/quick-jump-buttons-qjbs/#p8893</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>OMG this new QJB button is so cool. I just can't stop using it, hahahaha.</p>
<p>@Gioneo: Hmmm... that is an interesting proposal but I am wondering if a website can remap keys. Karen, where are youuuu.</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 19:11:06 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Gioneo on Quick-Jump Buttons (QJB's)</title>
        	<link>http://dottech.org/forums/improve-dottech/quick-jump-buttons-qjbs/#p8851</link>
        	<category>Improve dotTech</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dottech.org/forums/improve-dottech/quick-jump-buttons-qjbs/#p8851</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p> </p>
<p> Neat!   </p>
<p>Esthetic wise, I approve.</p>
<p>Goes up so fast I got dizzy...  <img src="/wp-content/forum-smileys/sf-wink.gif" alt="Wink" /></p>
<p>As far as a button going down, maybe we could just do with the Page Dn or End keys...</p>
<p><img src="/wp-content/forum-smileys/sf-confused.gif" alt="Confused" /></p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 17:17:14 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
</channel>
</rss>