<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>dotTech - Topic: Ad-Aware Fail?!</title>
	<link>http://dottech.org/forums/talk-it-up/ad-aware-fail/</link>
	<description><![CDATA[Professional Technologians]]></description>
	<generator>Simple:Press Version 5.2.6</generator>
	<atom:link href="http://dottech.org/forums/talk-it-up/ad-aware-fail/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <item>
        	<title>Locutus on Ad-Aware Fail?!</title>
        	<link>http://dottech.org/forums/talk-it-up/ad-aware-fail/#p12580</link>
        	<category>Talk it up</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dottech.org/forums/talk-it-up/ad-aware-fail/#p12580</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>All I ever learned about system time I learned from Wikipedia.  So there&#039;s the big possibility I&#039;m completely totally wrong. </p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:33:25 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>karen on Ad-Aware Fail?!</title>
        	<link>http://dottech.org/forums/talk-it-up/ad-aware-fail/#p12579</link>
        	<category>Talk it up</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dottech.org/forums/talk-it-up/ad-aware-fail/#p12579</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>@Locutus - Didn&#039;t know that about NT.  Java does it in milliseconds.  System.getCurrentTimeInMillis();</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 13:45:16 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Locutus on Ad-Aware Fail?!</title>
        	<link>http://dottech.org/forums/talk-it-up/ad-aware-fail/#p12573</link>
        	<category>Talk it up</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dottech.org/forums/talk-it-up/ad-aware-fail/#p12573</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Oooh wait that&#039;s Unix time that&#039;s 1-1-1970 isn&#039;t it?  D&#039;oh.  </p>
<p>@Karen:  Actually NT counts time by 100 nanoseconds, it just tells you in milliseconds.  Unix counts time in seconds.</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 20:16:31 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>karen on Ad-Aware Fail?!</title>
        	<link>http://dottech.org/forums/talk-it-up/ad-aware-fail/#p12571</link>
        	<category>Talk it up</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dottech.org/forums/talk-it-up/ad-aware-fail/#p12571</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Not really "the earliest computers can work with".  Most computers/programs store the date as a number and dates earlier than that are stored as a negative number of milliseconds before that date and dates after are stored as positive number of milliseconds.</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:17:56 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Ashraf on Ad-Aware Fail?!</title>
        	<link>http://dottech.org/forums/talk-it-up/ad-aware-fail/#p12565</link>
        	<category>Talk it up</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dottech.org/forums/talk-it-up/ad-aware-fail/#p12565</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Locutus said: </strong></p>
<blockquote><p>
Huh, that&#039;s odd.  Most programs revert to January 1st, 1970 rather than the day before.  It has to do with where calenders start on computers--that&#039;s the earliest date your computer can work with.</p>
</blockquote>
<hr />
Oh? The clock on my machine claims to be able to go as far back as 1930. Clearly I win.</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 05:08:34 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Pwnana on Ad-Aware Fail?!</title>
        	<link>http://dottech.org/forums/talk-it-up/ad-aware-fail/#p12563</link>
        	<category>Talk it up</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dottech.org/forums/talk-it-up/ad-aware-fail/#p12563</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Lol, do a search and you have every piece of malware known to man!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I don&#039;t know, because Steam once did a hardware analysis of my computer and came up with a windows install date of Dec 31 1969 too.</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 20:36:58 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Locutus on Ad-Aware Fail?!</title>
        	<link>http://dottech.org/forums/talk-it-up/ad-aware-fail/#p12562</link>
        	<category>Talk it up</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dottech.org/forums/talk-it-up/ad-aware-fail/#p12562</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Huh, that&#039;s odd.  Most programs revert to January 1st, 1970 rather than the day before.  It has to do with where calenders start on computers--that&#039;s the earliest date your computer can work with.</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 18:24:58 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>PCbasics on Ad-Aware Fail?!</title>
        	<link>http://dottech.org/forums/talk-it-up/ad-aware-fail/#p12561</link>
        	<category>Talk it up</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://dottech.org/forums/talk-it-up/ad-aware-fail/#p12561</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>I had a little laugh today when i checked my ad-aware pro. I had got ad-aware from a promo not too long ago, but anyway i was just examinating the main/home page of the program and noticed the date of the "last event" and was quite shocked and confused....maybe you&#039;ll get the same reaction<img src="/wp-content/forum-smileys/sf-laugh.gif" alt="Laugh" />:</p>
<p><img src="http://pcbasics.webs.com/screenshots/ad-ware%20fail.png" alt="" /></p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 17:59:22 -0700</pubDate>
        </item>
</channel>
</rss>