dotTech - Topic: Opera 10.60

Locutus on Opera 10.60

Sat, 03 Jul 2010 10:22:28 -0700

Dang it.

calebstein on Opera 10.60

Sat, 03 Jul 2010 10:17:23 -0700

Locutus said:

I have it. Is there any way to "archive" things in mail? Cause I have Gmail, and I archive all mail once I read it/disregard it.

I'm not sure, because I don't archive my mail.

Locutus on Opera 10.60

Sat, 03 Jul 2010 10:16:21 -0700

I have it. Is there any way to "archive" things in mail? Cause I have Gmail, and I archive all mail once I read it/disregard it.

calebstein on Opera 10.60

Sat, 03 Jul 2010 10:13:30 -0700

Locutus said:

Actually, both of those are built on Chromium. Google Chrome adds "stalker features" and gives it the Google logo, and SWare Iron... well it just adds the SWare logo. Chromium is better than SWare thusly.

Yep, and Chromium is the best of those three. But Opera is still the best!

Locutus on Opera 10.60

Sat, 03 Jul 2010 10:08:03 -0700

Actually, both of those are built on Chromium. Google Chrome adds "stalker features" and gives it the Google logo, and SWare Iron... well it just adds the SWare logo. Chromium is better than SWare thusly.

calebstein on Opera 10.60

Sat, 03 Jul 2010 09:00:44 -0700

Joji said:

Though, AVG isn't as good as MSE am I correct? Of coarse, even though Chrome is unprotected, you can still use other variations such as "SR Ware: Iron" which is very protected am I correct?

Or you can just run Chrome in sandbox mode too. Very handy. :D

~Joji~

Actually, SRWare: Iron just strips out the stalker features

Joji on Opera 10.60

Sat, 03 Jul 2010 08:59:46 -0700

Though, AVG isn't as good as MSE am I correct? Of coarse, even though Chrome is unprotected, you can still use other variations such as "SR Ware: Iron" which is very protected am I correct?

Or you can just run Chrome in sandbox mode too. Very handy. :D

~Joji~

calebstein on Opera 10.60

Sat, 03 Jul 2010 08:58:38 -0700

Locutus said:

Those are the real-time results :P 34% is horrid.

Well 59% isn't much better.

Locutus on Opera 10.60

Sat, 03 Jul 2010 08:57:51 -0700

Those are the real-time results :P 34% is horrid.

calebstein on Opera 10.60

Sat, 03 Jul 2010 08:54:12 -0700

Locutus said:

Chrome is unprotected. Firefox uses the program installed on your system, which saves memory usage, disk space, and it thus has a better protection engine with less false positives (check out this chart:

)

See, MSSE, what I have, is better! More everything was caught, and with less false positives!

Hmm, I didn't know that. Well, a good AV scans files in real time, so I'd say that if a gets past Opera, your usual AV would catch it.

Locutus on Opera 10.60

Sat, 03 Jul 2010 08:52:08 -0700

Chrome is unprotected. Firefox uses the program installed on your system, which saves memory usage, disk space, and it thus has a better protection engine with less false positives (check out this chart:

)

See, MSSE, what I have, is better! More everything was caught, and with less false positives!

calebstein on Opera 10.60

Sat, 03 Jul 2010 08:45:07 -0700

Joji said:

Avg engine eh? So let me get this straight. Opera has an AVG engine, but what does Chrome and Firefox have then?

~Joji~

Well, I don't use them much, but as a best guess, I'd say vulnerabilities?

Joji on Opera 10.60

Sat, 03 Jul 2010 07:38:48 -0700

Avg engine eh? So let me get this straight. Opera has an AVG engine, but what does Chrome and Firefox have then?

~Joji~

Locutus on Opera 10.60

Sat, 03 Jul 2010 04:57:43 -0700

Sure. I'll scope out the competition.

jumbi on Opera 10.60

Sat, 03 Jul 2010 04:15:44 -0700

thanks for the info!

(mine was automatically updated but I did not read teh changes and your post came nicely)