<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free TuneUp Utilites 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dottech.org/freebies/1254/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dottech.org/freebies/1254</link>
	<description>Professional Technologians</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 20:37:57 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bo Hunt</title>
		<link>http://dottech.org/freebies/1254/comment-page-1#comment-409</link>
		<dc:creator>Bo Hunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 13:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dottech.org/?p=1254#comment-409</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using this for a couple of days and I like it.  Install went without a hitch.  My previous software found no problems with my registry, this one found 386 on the first scan.  The internet download/surfing accelerator also worked really well when I ran it.  So far, Tuneup Utilities 2007 is working great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using this for a couple of days and I like it.  Install went without a hitch.  My previous software found no problems with my registry, this one found 386 on the first scan.  The internet download/surfing accelerator also worked really well when I ran it.  So far, Tuneup Utilities 2007 is working great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ortodox</title>
		<link>http://dottech.org/freebies/1254/comment-page-1#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>Ortodox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 23:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dottech.org/?p=1254#comment-270</guid>
		<description>Have tried a few of various reg. cleanerers (TuneUp among them too).I tink, all of them use diferent registry cleaning methods because i had to reinstal my system when used a few utils on the same time. Now using jv16 for a few ( mayby 5) years. 
 Keep on doing good job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have tried a few of various reg. cleanerers (TuneUp among them too).I tink, all of them use diferent registry cleaning methods because i had to reinstal my system when used a few utils on the same time. Now using jv16 for a few ( mayby 5) years.<br />
 Keep on doing good job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
