Apple asks ITC to stay the import ban on older iPhone and iPad products

iphone4

By August 5, an import ban on iPhone 4 and iPad 2G will take effect following the ruling issued by the International Trade Commission. The import ban was a result of the ongoing worldwide legal tussle between Apple and Samsung over various smartphone patents. Samsung won this one over Apple when it claimed that the iPad 2G and iPhone 4 has infringed the coding technology owned and patented by Samsung.

Now, with only four weeks before the import ban takes effect, Apple is asking the ITC to issue a stay arguing that an appeal is still pending in court. In the motion filed by Apple, the company says that the implementation of the import ban will not only wipe out an entire segment of Apple’s products but also hurt carriers who are in partnership with Apple. The iPhone 4 although two models behind the current iPhone 5 is the fourth most popular smartphone in the U.S. in 2012. Up to now, some carriers are still offering the iPhone 4 as an entry-level Apple device. Hence, the import will potential sweep away an important market, according to Apple.

Apple also argues that the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals where it has filed its petition against the ITC decision will most probably find the patent invalid and hence rule in favor of Apple.  But if the appeals court rules against Apple’s appeal, then Samsung can collect damages in a parallel court later on.

[via GigaOM]

Share this post

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

2 comments

  1. internetexplorer

    Since when can a non-U.S. entity issue an order banning U.S. imports of something? Does anybody see the problem here? It makes the U.S. government subservient to an unelected international bureaucracy! Obama should get this changed ASAP.

  2. Mike

    What was Apple’s position as to Samsung when Apple earlier won its case against Samsung in federal district court in Northern California–stay any ban on Samsung’s products until the issues were decided on appeal . . . .?