ISPs to start enforcing “six strikes” program, an attempt to “educate” consumers on piracy by slowing internet connections or blocking websites

SOPA and PIPA are dead. But anti-piracy measures by the entertainment industry are not. In collaboration with big entertainment, internet service providers (ISPs) in the United States will soon be implementing significant anti-piracy measures across their entire subscriber base. Two of the largest ISPs in the US, Time Warner and Verizon, plan to use a system dubbed the “six strikes” anti-piracy program.

The “six strikes” anti-piracy program is an initiative by ISPs to try to curb illegal file sharing by their customers. It is important to note that the ISPs won’t be tracking customer internet activity per se, but rather will know a customer is pirating if their IP address has been recorded as taking part in peer-to-peer torrenting of copyrighted content (you won’t get in trouble for torrenting free or open source content). The program is designed to alert customer in phases, rather than the old way of “let’s send them a notice that they pirated something and ask for money to avoid a lawsuit” that we’ve seen in the past years.

The first of these phases is the “notice” phase, in which notifications are sent to the customer regarding the allegations of illegal activity with copyrighted files. Notifications can be via telephone and e-mail, but may be snail mail too depending on your ISP.

The second, which is the “acknowledgement” phase, forces the user to respond to these allegations through a pop-up window of some sort, to make sure that “they’re getting to the right people”. Using a positive confirmation method makes sense, because, as Verizon VP Link Hoewing notes, that there are potential situations wherein five people could be sharing an internet connection, and the person guilty of copyright infringement isn’t necessarily the account holder.

The last of the “six strikes” anti-piracy program is the third stage (why is it “six” strikes if there are only three stages?), the “mitigation” phase. This is the part where subscribers actually have to face the consequences of engaging in online piracy. Fortunately for consumers, this stage doesn’t end with people being sued. But for heavy internet users, it could be just as bad. Verizon subscribers will see their speeds throttled for around two to three days, albeit with a 14-day notice before the speed decrease actually starts. Time Warner subscribers, however, will have people screaming net neutrality all over again because “popular websites” will be blocked for alleged infringers This is how Fernando Laguarda, Time Warner VP, puts it:

We’re constructing a soft landing area, where the customer is restricted in the type of browsing that they can do. If they appeal, all those measures are suspended pending the appeal.

So if Time Warner users appeal (and pay a fine), they can get their service restored. Much better than being sued outright, that’s for sure, but still feels like ransom.

Interestingly enough, the entertainment industry is looking at this as an education mechanism rather than a litigation tool. Ron Wheeler, a senior VP at Fox Broadcasting, says:

This is not about suing users at all. This system is not designed to produce lawsuits—it’s designed to produce education.

While currently Verizon and Time Warner are the big two to take part in this program, soon we could see other ISPs participating as well. Seeing as ISPs have elbow-room as to how they enforce the program (the enforcement fo the program is not legally binding but rather is an agreement between ISPs and entertainment companies), before we know it we may have different versions of the six strikes program floating around.

Personally speaking, while I’m not a fan of measures like this, this actually seems fair if you think about it. I mean you are warned twice before you have to actually face the consequences (aka you can clarify misunderstandings prior to the third phase), and the consequences you do face are significantly better than the legal extortion that has been going on for years. However, while Verizon’s “punishment” is sensible, Time Warner is going a bit far by determining which sites you can and cannot visit when you’re the under the mitigation phase.

What do you think? Is this the way to “educate” people about piracy? Do you have better ideas? Hit up the comments to let us know!

[via ArsTechnica]

Share this post

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

9 comments

  1. Eagle

    It’s worth noting that the ONE reason ISP’s can’t get sued is that they are just a conduit, like a highway, through which unfiltered material passes.

    UP UNTIL NOW they have simply been that conduit. Just as you cannot sue the postal service for delivering a fraudulent solicitation from someone who ultimately steals your money, you ALSO cannot sue an ISP for providing service that steals your copyrighted material OR (and this is the interesting part) causes you other harm.

    UNTIL NOW. Now? Since ISP’s are now screening for content and are NOW taking responsibility for that content, they ALSO ASSUME responsibility for a whole BUNCH of nasty things. To wit:

    Got a virus from the internet that wiped out your hard drive and cost you thousands? Your ISP is now liable SINCE they are no longer JUST a passive conduit. They assume responsibility for their content and it was THEIR negligence which got you infected. Pay me, Verizon. Got a letter from Nigeria asking you to please give them $thousands and you do? Yep, your ISP SHOULD’ve caught that and they were negligent in not doing so. Verizon, pay me and –oh yeah — add a few $million for my pain and suffering over your negligence.

    Bottom-line: These idiots have no idea the can of whup-ass they just unleashed upon themselves. But, at least they’ve got Big Entertainment to comfort them in their nightmare.

    Could this happen? Somewhere, you can bet that there’s a lawyer just itching to try and , one of these days, they’re gonna find a judge to agree. Game over, suckers.

  2. Bruce

    They’re going to have to be doing a lot of analysis of content to determine when something is copyrighted, and a lot more analysis to determine that it’s being transmitted for improper reasons.

  3. onedeafeye

    @Ashraf:
    “”It is important to note that the ISPs won’t be tracking customer internet activity per se, but rather will know a customer is pirating if their IP address has been recorded as taking part in peer-to-peer torrenting.”
    If torrenting copyrighted material is what you meant, then maybe you should say that in the article. I got the same impression clockmendergb had.

  4. clockmendergb

    “if their IP address has been recorded as taking part in peer-to-peer torrenting”

    That should stop it in its tracks.

    There are a thousand more reasons for Torrents than just pirating.

    File sharing is a major form of idea propagation.
    Its is used heavily in the Open source community and by new and un-contracted musicians and artists who want to share their work.

    The entertainment industry has been trying to throttle this free expression to farther their own ends.
    The content providers are playing along under the threat of content limitations.

    We the people are being screwed in order for someone else to profit.

    Now I could be wrong of course.