[Review] Web Video Downloader 1.2 ***Updated***

{rw_text}Giveaway of the day for March 26 2009 is:

Web Video Downloader 1.2

Version reviewed:

v1.2 Build 81030

Software description as per GOTD:

Sothink Web Video Downloader, a convenient video downloader, can detect any live video from internet, capture, download and save them to your PC for offline enjoyment.

You can download Flash videos (flv) from YouTube, MSN, Google, or videos in other formats (swf, wmv, asf, avi, mov, mp4, m4v, 3gp, rm, rmvb, etc.) from most video hosting sites and blogs.

————————-{/rw_text} –>


  • Simple and easy to use.
  • Works with multiple different browsers.
  • Able to download many types of online videos.
  • You get to ‘preview’ the video before you download.

{/rw_good} –>


  • Can’t discriminate between “useful” and “useless” video downloads.
  • Does not work with Chrome.
  • You can’t control how long a notification window will stay up for a video.

{/rw_bad} –>

{for=”Features as Described” value=”10″}It claims to be able to download videos. It downloads videos.
{for=”Ease of Use” value=”7″}Since this program detects all videos, including the useless ones, it can get overwhelming by the amount of videos that are captured. Other then that, this program is literally point and click.
{for=”Performance” value=”8″}While it can’t download all videos on the internet (it does not claim to be able to), it downloads videos. However it gets a 8 because resource usage can get very high depending on your settings.
{for=”Usefulness” value=”10″}Come on – who won’t be grabbing this?
{for=”Arbitrary Equalizer” value=”10″}This category reflects an arbitrary number that does not specifically stand for anything. Rather this number is used to reflect my overall rating/verdict of the program in which I considered all the features and free alternatives.
{/rw_score} –>

{/rw_verdict} –>

Update: A dotTech reader, noha (thanks!), reminded me of another free alternative to Web Video Downloader. It hurt my ego to know that I forgot to include this free alternative (considering that I already knew about it) so at first I refused to issue an update. However this free alternative is a great program and to not let my readers know about it would be a disservice. Therefore I swallowed my pride and decided to issue an update. My rating of Web Video Downloader has not changed. However I tweaked my recommendations. Thus if you have already read this review, feel free to drop down to “Free Alternatives” and “Final Verdict” to read the updated verdict.

Registration and installation went fine. You have to manually register Web Video Downloader so be sure to grab the registration information from readme.txt and register the software via Help -> Register.

SoThink Web Video Downloader is a program that allows you to download streaming video off the internet. WVD will not download all streaming video on the internet (for example you won’t be able to download the full episodes for TV shows from NBC, ABC, Fox – this is because they take “special steps” to ensure no one can download those videos) but it does a good job with most of them.

WVD has the ability to capture and download streaming video of the following type:


“Flash Movie (*.swf)” is disabled by default. You must manually go enable it. You can do this via View -> Options -> Video Capture.

This is what the WVD program window looks like:


Even though the program is very easy to use, to help teach users how to use it, the developer included a quick and simple tutorial with the progra. When you first run WVD the tutorial will appear. The tutorial shows you how the program works. I have recorded that tutorial so I that I can show it my review for those people to view who have not download WVD yet:

Besides what is shown in the tutorial, there are two other things I would like to discuss about WVD:

  • “Capture History” Log:


This log records all the videos that have been captured by WVD but not downloaded. You can download the videos by clicking on them and hitting “Download”.

There is no way to manually clear this log; it resets every time you close WVD.

  • Options



One thing I would like to point out is that WVD gives you the ability to add more browsers to monitor then just the default IE, Firefox, Opera and Maxathon. However I tried to add Chrome to the list and WVD did not work with it. If someone has any luck with getting WVD to work with Chrome, post below.




Lastly I would like to talk about the computer resource usage of WVD. Sitting idle in my system tray, it only used ~6 MB of RAM. Not too shabby. However with one “Video Captured” notification window the RAM usage jumped to ~40 MB and CPU usage was ~10%. This is because the video that was captured was being played in the little notification window. If you don’t think your computer will be able to handle this, you can turn off the notification windows in totality from View -> Options -> Video Captured; uncheck “Display a notification…”. However if your computer can handle the extra resource usage I recommend leaving the notification feature on because it is very handy in knowing what video you are downloading since it lets you “preview” the videos.

Overall this program works pretty well. However there are a few gripes that I have:

  • Often flash videos are used for many things on the internet, including advertisements. WVD captures every single video it finds – even the useless ones, such as the ones related with advertising. I understand that it is not possible to accurately label every single video as “useful and desired” or “useless”; however since WVD is a commercial product, at the very least the developer of WVD needs to add in a “blacklist” feature where URLs of popular advertising websites/companies are put in. This way WVD will not prompt you to download “useless” videos.
  • Even though you are supposed to be able to manually add extra browsers for WVD to watch, as I mentioned above, WVD does not work with Chrome (I added it manually and tested it out).
  • There is no way to control how long a “Captured Video” notification popup window stays on your monitor. Currently it stays there until you click “X” on it or download the video. I find this annoying because often WVD finds a lot of “useless” videos; these notifications stay up for these “useless” videos until I close the notifications manually. Now yes it is possible to turn off these notifications in totalitity, but these notifications are a nice feature of this program that I would like to use. Therefore I would like to see the developer add an options that gives the user the ability to control how long these notifications stay on your monitor, i.e. make them disappear after X seconds.
  • WVD automatically adds itself to your start up program list. You can remove it from the start up program list by going to View -> Options -> General; however I find this to be very annoying that it adds itself without asking me. Good thing I have WinPatrol that tells me these kind of things.

This review was conducted on a laptop running Windows Vista Home Premium 32-bit. The specs of the laptop are as follows: 3GB of RAM, a Radeon HD 2600 512MB graphics card, and an Intel T8300 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo processor.

URL Snooper

URL Snooper is one of my favorite programs of all times. In fact it is on my list of programs to write about (except to see a URL Snooper Tips ‘n Tricks article in the near future).

URL Snooper literally does exactly what Sothink Web Video Downloader does: it monitors and finds streaming videos on the internet and tells you about it.

The difference between URL Snooper and Sothink WVD is:

  • URL Snooper is not just for videos – it works with streaming audio files also.
  • URL Snooper monitors your network traffic and detects streaming audio/video from there. Therefore URL Snooper is browser independent; in other words it works with all browsers.
  • URL Snooper does not have the fancy notification windows.
  • You cannot preview your video in URL Snooper before downloading.

The performance of URL Snooper and Web Video Downloader is similar; however I have been having problems lately trying to download videos from YouTube w/ URL Snooper (it used to work before; YouTube may have just made recent changes and the developer of URL Snooper has not got up to speed yet).


While ClipFinder is not a program that is similar to URL Snooper or WVD, ClipFinder allows you to download videos from 14 popular video hosting websites. Additionally, ClipFinder serves a search engine for the 14 popular video hosting services.

The video hosting services it supports are:

1. YouTube.com
2. iFilm.com (aka Spike.com)
3. Veoh.com
4. Dailymotion.com
5. Video.Google.com
6. Livevideo.com
7. Blip.tv
8. Video.Yahoo.com
9. Metacafe.com
10. Vids.MySpace.com
11. Sevenload.de
12. MyVideo.de
13. VideU.de
14. ClipFish.de

In addition to being able to search all those website simultaneously with the same query, you have the ability to download the videos (as mentioned above). You can either view a video and click on the download button, or click on “URL – Adress” button from the top and paste in a URL. You can download videos from any of the 14 websites mentioned above (you may also be able to download from more sources but I have not found any yet). The videos are downloaded to your Documents/My Documents folder.

RealPlayer (thx noha)

RealPlayer (as most of us probably already know) has a feature (“video grabber”) that allows you to download streaming videos off the internet. All you do is right click on the video that is playing -> “Download with RealPlayer” and RealPlayer will download it.

Any videos you download with Web Video Downloader you should be able to get with RealPlayer.

{/rw_freea} –>

{rw_verdict2}Web Video Downloader, despite some of the annoyances I mentioned above, is a great program that deserves a thumbs up. However at the same time, URL Snooper and RealPlayer (video grabber) are also great programs. All three have advantages and disadvantages over the other. However, in my opinion, RealPlayer (video grabber) is the most user friendly out of all these programs. Thus I recommend you download RealPlayer and use it to download streaming videos. Secondly, since URL Snooper can help you download streaming audio in addition to streaming video, I recommend you get URL Snooper also. Lastly, having the ability to search 14 different video hosting websites (and download their videos) is a great asset to have; thus I say you also grab ClipFinder. I know – you must be thinking “Is Ashraf crazy? He tells us to download 3 programs?”. All I can say is trust me: they are all worth it. I personally have all three.
{/rw_verdict2} –>

Related Posts

  • Jean-Luc Picard

    Why am I being served up an old version of the page?
    The newest comment (by Noam) is nowhere to be seen.
    The latest comment I can see is:
    “Thanks for the review, and URL Snooper really works great! I also tried the cache viewer, and it works good also. Great website, too.” by Matt.

  • Noam


    Regarding MikeR’S ‘Or have I missed something here’ question –

    Yes, you do. The thing is, without getting into a lot of technical details, that there are couple of protocols being used to stream media, and not all of them are being cached by definition, doesn’t matter at all what is your browser – or whatever – configuration is, note that. That is one major reason for a program not to be able to download a stream, and there are more (but I’m trying to keep this comment as short as I can). Capturing media can be a complicated task with a lot more than just one solution. The fact that you succeeded to use your cache to dig the files – won’t guarantee you’ll able to do that in the future.


  • Matt

    Thanks for the review, and URL Snooper really works great! I also tried the cache viewer, and it works good also. Great website, too.

  • Haha, I think he was joking.

  • Hey me three.

    Wait, you don’t read the entire review, you just skim!?!?

  • windowsexplorer: Are you internetexplorer under a different nick? :P

    I haven’t heard very positive things about RealPlayer, but CNet’s review seems pretty positive. http://download.cnet.com/RealPlayer/3000-13632_4-10073040.html?tag=mncol;psum

  • Hey me three.

  • Jean-Luc Picard: Haha, I skim to the recommendation, and then either download it or look at the alternatives out of curiosity :P

  • windowsexplorer

    I should have said XP could download videos, but I guess that does not include live streaming video feeds. My bad. However, I have always understood that RealPlayer is a “bad actor” and recommended not to have it on your system due to ads, running at startup, hard to remove, etc. Has that changed or have I been misinformed about RP? Thank you.

  • Ya I saw that program at Raymond’s blog. Have not tried it yet but it sounds good.

  • giovanni

    Very nice tool…absolutely a KEEPER…no way!!

    But if you want to download and stream Online Videos 5 TIMES FASTER without buffering problems, why not add to this GEM a nice tool such as BYWIFI 1.4.2 VIDEO STREAMING DOWNLOADER, an astonishing application using multiple technologies to speed up video streaming??


    * Support Youtube, Dailymotion, Metacafe, MySpace, Yahoo, etc. video websites
    * Support IE, Firefox and Google Chrome
    * Support FLV, WMV, RM, RMVB
    * Provide powerful video search features allowing users to search all videos in the world
    * For the same video, it does not need to buffer again when you close the Web Browser.
    * Support lots of advance network technologies like P2SP(peer-to-server-and-peer), multiple tasks, web sensitive, intelligence caching
    * Download and transcode the videos format with one button: the video formats support mobile phone and PDA, such as Nokia, iPhone, SamSung, iPad, iPod, and PSP.

    Full review of this GEM can be read on the legendary RAYMOND cc Blog:


    Did I say that it’s FREE???


    Good night from Italy


    P.S. I have important news for you about AVIRA 9, but maybe we’d better talk about this issue via email rather than here…what do you make of it, Ashraf?

  • Jeanjean

    I agree with Ashraf.
    I went on a usual site, where I started 4 videos.
    Web Video Downloader have only suggested 2 to download.
    With the program “Video Cache View” (without installation) I could download all four…!?
    Other ways, I found URL Snooper to complicate to install.

  • MikeR,

    Honestly I never gave it much thought. If I was to make a quick conjecture I would say:

    • Programs like WVD are less “technical” at the forefront so people seem more comfortable using them as opposed to looking through the cache. In other words its a mental thing.
    • There are always multiple ways of doing things.
    • Not many people know about the “get from cache method” or they know about it but never really gave it much thought (like me).

    Feel free to pipe in if you have any other theories.

  • MikeR

    Hi Ashraf:

    Hey, thanks for that link — I’d never heard of VideoCacheView before.

    To be honest, I don’t actually watch that many videos of the YouTube variety anyway, so it’s generally the case that I go the above route to the IE cache and copy and paste from there as either the file is topping the cache list or instantly becomes identifiable when ranking by size.

    Am still baffled though about today’s software: surely my IE cache operates the same way as every other IE user?? (Like windowsexplorer’s post?)

  • MikeR and windowsexplorer,

    If that is the case, then you guys will like VideoCacheView I can tell :).

  • MikeR

    I think what windowsexplorer is referring to is the fact that anything you view on your computer has had to be downloaded anyway. So, er, why’d you need *another* downloader?

    I’m using XP SP3 (but the same applied with SP2).

    I watch a YouTube (or whatever video). If I want to keep it, I go to the IE Tools menu / Internet options / Browsing History / Settings / View Files and voila, there’s the cached file of whatever it is I’ve just seen. Click ‘copy’ and paste wherever you want.

    I really am baffled by all this fuss about video downloaders when the files are *already* there on the computer.

    Or have I missed something here? (Seeing as how I’ve never missed ANY video from ANY source using the above method. . .)

  • windowsexplorer,

    I am not sure I understand what you are asking. What do you mean “if Windows (XP) already can do it”?

  • Noha,

    You bring up a good point about RealPlayer. I actually forgot about it =). To be honest, I think RealPlayer should be able to download all the videos that Web Video Downloader would get so you probably don’t need this.

  • windowsexplorer

    One thing I don’t understand if you could tell me, is, why would I need a separate program to download video if Windows (XP) already can do it? Is there some fundamental advantage, other than the bells and whistles?

  • John c

    Great Review! Good to see you back reviewing GAOTD again. Missed you last several days. I always look for your review!
    Amazing how you can post such good reviews in so little time! Keep up great work!

  • noha

    I’ve got realplayer and it downloads youtube videos…is this worth the download?


  • After actually reading a review, wow, you write great reviews!

    I think you’ve convinced me to not skim!

  • Jon,

    As I posted above I was unable to get WVD to work with Chrome but URL Snooper will work with Chrome.

  • Does anyone know how to make this work with Chrome?

    If you do, just email me to tell me.