Verizon Wireless gets iPhone 4, Steve Jobs eats a red apple to celebrate

Aside from the iPhone 4 itself, talk about the “Verizon iPhone 4” has probably been one of the most rumored rumors about a smartphone in the history of smartphones. Today, however, the story has been set straight. No longer is a Verizon iPhone 4 a rumor: It is a reality.

Image credit: Engadget.

At a press conference in New York City, Verizon and Apple revealed a CDMA version of the iPhone 4 will be available to Verizon customers starting February 10, 2011. (Current Verizon customers can pre-order beginning Feb 3.)

You blokes not living in the United States must be thinking “So what, what is the big deal?” The thing is whereas most places in the world people buy phones outright at their full price, here in the USA phones are typically bought at a subsidized price. People sign two-year contracts with service provides and in exchange get huge discounts on their phones. Because of this system, the phones people buy are typically limited to the phones carried by their service provider. The “big deal” is previously in the USA iPhone 4 was only available on AT&T; now iPhone 4 is available on Verizon Wireless, too. That means a lot more people will have the chance to get the iPhone 4 since Verizon Wireless is the largest cell phone service provider in the USA. (AT&T is second.) Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!

That, then, brings up the question: “Why can’t people just buy the iPhone 4 from AT&T, unlock it, and use it on a different carrier?” You can do that, yes. However, here in the USA two out of the four major service provides use CDMA (Verizon Wireless and Sprint) while the other two – AT&T and T-Mobile USA – use GSM. (Only in America!) GSM phones cannot be used on CDMA networks while CDMA phones cannot be used on GSM networks. Verizon uses CDMA instead of GSM. So Verizon’s iPhone 4 is CDMA (i.e. doesn’t need a SIM card), as opposed to AT&T’s iPhone 4 which is GSM (i.e. needs a SIM card).

Anyway, according to reports, the Verizon iPhone 4 is not too majorly different than AT&T’s iPhone 4. Aside from the obvious CDMA vs GSM, the only other differences between the “two” phones are Verizon iPhone 4 has a WiFi hotspot app, its volume/menu buttons are moved slightly down, and Verizon iPhone 4 cannot use talk and data simultaneously.

Personally speaking, I can’t help but think “too little, too late”. First of all, Verizon’s iPhone 4 is not 4G compatible whereas new Verizon Android phones – iPhone’s most fierce competitors – are LTE compatible. More importantly, however, the Phone (2G/3G/3GS/4) has been around since 2007. Anyone that really wanted the iPhone has already moved to AT&T to get it. While sure there will be some people who will switch back to Verizon (Verizon’s network is rock-solid compared to AT&T’s), and sure there will be some current Verizon customers who will switch to the iPhone 4, Android handsets have been substituted for the iPhone 4 ever since Verizon’s multi-million dollar Droid Does campaign. In other words, I don’t expect the Verizon iPhone 4 to turn too many heads in terms of customers. However, what do I know? I am just a lowly blogger; time is the true judge.

Discuss, please. Let’s hear some iPhone bashing thoughts on the matter in the comments below!

[via Engadget]

Related Posts

  • Don


    Android is available on various sizes of tablet PCs. Archos makes a wide range of them. Other manufacturers make them also. Shouldn’t be too long before it shows up on netbooks, laptops and desktops.

  • Dinker

    I am going to wait the intial glut of subscribers will overload the system and a new iphone is on the way this summer. Also I am convinced that android phones will be better this year

  • Antonio

    @Verizon: So What!

    I agree, the Droid set me free over a year ago (in cellphone years that’s about 3 years ago). I am very content with what my rooted DROID DOES.

  • mukhi


    windows 7 phone is gonna take the market as well, let them come with a few fixes and more apps in a few months. trust me, win7 phones are way better than typical windows mobiles. and, android is developing fast now.

    apparently, google has decided to use android mostly for ultra-mobile devices like phones, chrome OS for tablets and netbooks. for notebooks and desktops, windows 7 is still the choice. however, swap may happen and work with properly selected harware.

    @Dennis F.

    yes, iphone should have a better antenna, i can’t believe people pay so much for a “crappy phone”.

    off-topic, but i really wished ipad came with real OSX and some ports like USB, card reader and a webcam. just can’t believe they are asking for $500 for 16 GB with so limited capabilities.

  • Bob

    I wonder if this iphone will get a new calling problem :)

  • Hmmm, I just read that in the last 3 months iPhones are up a couple percent, Windows phones are down a couple percent, and Androids are up 8%. Seems to me that somebody ought to come up with a PC operating system called “Android”.

  • Dennis F.

    All I see is $$$ signs. Besides this locks you into a 2 year iPhone4. Wait 6 months and get the iPhone5 and later technology – and maybe a better antenna.

  • mukhi

    even after discount with contract, iphone is felt expensive (android/win7 smartphones are now either free or almost free). as a phone, iphone is not that great specially version 4 for at&t. if you are looking for a great portable multimedia device (having ipod, youtube, browser, camera, etc) which can “also” be used as a phone, go for it.